• KANAD
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Effects of a New Nursing Delivery System on Nurses' Satisfaction, Self-efficacy, Job Stress, and Nursing Performance in a University Hospital

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2017;23(3):301-311.
Published online: June 30, 2017

1Department of Nursing Science, Chungbuk National University, Korea.

2Chungbuk National University Hospital, Korea.

Corresponding author: Choi, Eun Ha. Chungbuk National University Hospital, 1 Sunhwan-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 776, Korea. Tel: +82-43-269-6710, Fax: +82-43-269-7608, eunhatn@gmail.com
• Received: April 20, 2017   • Revised: June 17, 2017   • Accepted: June 17, 2017

Copyright © 2017 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 20 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Crossref
prev next
  • Purpose
    The purpose of this study was to identify effects of moving from a functional method of nursing care delivery to a modified team nursing delivery system.
  • Methods
    A structured self-report questionnaire was used to measure satisfaction with the nursing delivery system, self-efficacy, job stress and nursing performance. Participants were 72 nurses working at a university hospital and data were collected three times; before, one month and three months after the modification to a modified team nursing delivery system. Data were analyzed using repeated measure ANOVA.
  • Results
    Satisfaction with the nursing delivery system increased significantly after the change to the modified team nursing method. There were no significant differences in self-efficacy, job stress, or nursing performance. However, satisfaction with the nursing delivery system and nursing performance increased and job stress decreased significantly in new nurses with less than 1 year experience.
  • Conclusion
    Results indicate that a modified team nursing method has positive results on nurses' satisfaction, self-efficacy, job stress, and nursing performance compared to the functional method. Effect of changing the nursing delivery system in the hospital suggests possibilities and directions for a modified nursing delivery system that would be useful in hospitals presently using the functional method.
  • 1. Jung MS, Park KO, Kim SY, Kim EK, Kim EY, Kim JK, et al. Nursing management. 2nd ed. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa; 2016. p. 1-391.
  • 2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health care resources: Hospital beds [Internet]. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. updated October 7, 2016. cited April 7, 2017. Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH_REAC
  • 3. Hwang JS, Yu BN. In search of strategic management for PFV (Patient Focus Value) in Korean hospitals. Korea Bus Rev. 2006;44:331-348.
  • 4. Tiedeman ME, Lookinland S. Traditional models of care delivery: What have we learned. J Nurs Adm. 2004;34(6):291-297.
  • 5. Oh ES. Autonomy level of nurse according to nursing delivery system. Korean J Occup Health Nurs. 2000;9(2):155-165.
  • 6. Kim SS, Chae GS, Kim KN, Park KO, Moon SM. Survey on nursing care delivery systems of university affiliated hospitals in Korea. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2010;16(1):167-175.
  • 7. Kim JY, Park BH, Ko YK. The status nursing care delivery system and the influencing factors on quality of nursing care. Korean J Hosp Manag. 2016;21(2):24-36.
  • 8. Adams A, Bond S, Hale CA. Nursing organizational practice and its relationship with other features of ward organization and job satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 1998;27(6):1212-1222.
  • 9. Ji AN. The effects of team nursing system on nursing performance at a general hospital [master's thesis]. Wonju: Yonsei University; 2002.
  • 10. Park YJ, Lee SJ, Jang SO. The second study on the effectiveness of nursing organization. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1997;27(2):253-263.
  • 11. Thomas LH. A comparison of the verbal interactions of qualified nurses and nursing auxiliaries in primary, team and functional nursing wards. Int J Nurs Stud. 1994;31:231-244.
  • 12. Reed SE. A comparison of nurse-related behaviour, philosophy of care and job satisfaction in team and primary nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1988;13(3):383-395.
  • 13. Park YJ, Lee SJ, Chang SO, Lee ES. Study on the effectiveness of nursing organization of one tertiary hospital. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 1997;3(2):109-122.
  • 14. Choi EH, Lee HS, Kim JH, Ko MS, Kim BS. Effect of changes in nursing delivery system on satisfaction of nurses and patients and direct nursing time. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2013;19(2):217-226.
  • 15. Slavitt DB, Stamps PL, Piedmont EB, B . Hasse AM. Nurses' satisfaction with their work situation. Nurs Res. 1978;27(2):114-120.
  • 16. Kim HK. Nursing care delivery system satisfaction, job performance, turnover intention and nursing organizational culture in the nurses in university hospitals [master's thesis]. Seoul: Catholic University; 2009.
  • 17. Sherer M, Maddux JE, Mercandante B, Prentice-Dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers RW. The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychol Rep. 1982;51(2):663-671.
  • 18. Chang SJ, Koh SB. Development of the Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS). Korean J Stress Res. 2005;13(3):183-197.
  • 19. Park YJ, Lee SJ, Chang SO. The second study on the effectiveness of nursing organization. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1997;27(2):253-263.
  • 20. Lee JH, Lee SA, Ham YH, Yang MJ, Kim OS. Nursing delivery system improvement plan in a hospital. J Korean Soc Qual Assur Health Care. 1996;3(2):52-59.
  • 21. Lee SH. A study on the relationship between professional selfconcept, self-efficacy and job satisfaction in clinical nurses. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2008;20(1):10-20.
  • 22. Park HK. The structural equation modeling on job performance of clinical nurses [dissertation]. Busan: Kosin University; 2013. p. 1-87.
  • 23. Lee SJ, Kang MK, Gwon SH, Song GH, Lee JH, Choi JR, et al. A study on job stress between experienced versus new nurse. Chung-Ang J Nurs. 2002;6(1):89-99.
  • 24. Suominen T, Leino-Kilpi H, Merja M, Doran DI, Puukka P. Staff empowerment in Finnish intensive care units. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2001;17(6):341-347.
  • 25. Korean Hospital Nurses Association. A survey on hospital nursing staffing (2015). Business report for Hospital Nurses Association. Seoul: The Association; 2016.
  • 26. Bartels JE. Educating nurses for the 21st century. Nurs Health Sci. 2005;7(4):221-225.
Figure 1

Functional method of nursing care delivery system in study hospital.

jkana-23-301-g001.jpg
Figure 2

Modified team nursing method of nursing care delivery system in study hospital.

jkana-23-301-g002.jpg
Table 1

General Characteristics of Study Participants (N=72)

jkana-23-301-i001.jpg
Table 2

Differences in Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy, Job Stress and Nursing Performance according to Time (N=72)

jkana-23-301-i002.jpg

Pre=Functional method; Post 1M=Modified team nursing method 1 month later; Post 3M=Modified team nursing method 3 months later.

Table 3

Differences in Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy, Job Stress, and Nursing Performance according to Time Series (N=72)

jkana-23-301-i003.jpg

Pre=functional method; Post 1M=modified team nursing method 1 month later; Post 3M=modified team nursing method 3 months later; a, b>c; a<c.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Effects of Patient Safety Management System, Leadership, and Communication Types on Nurse’ Patient Safety Management Activities
      Eunji Lee, Haejung Lee
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2024; 30(4): 367.     CrossRef
    • A comparative analysis of nurses' reported number of patients and perceived appropriate number of patients in integrated nursing care services
      Hyunjeong Kwon, Jinhyun Kim
      Nursing & Health Sciences.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Effects of a New Nursing Delivery System on Nurses' Satisfaction, Self-efficacy, Job Stress, and Nursing Performance in a University Hospital
    J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2017;23(3):301-311.   Published online June 30, 2017
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Effects of a New Nursing Delivery System on Nurses' Satisfaction, Self-efficacy, Job Stress, and Nursing Performance in a University Hospital
    J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2017;23(3):301-311.   Published online June 30, 2017
    Close

    Figure

    • 0
    • 1
    Effects of a New Nursing Delivery System on Nurses' Satisfaction, Self-efficacy, Job Stress, and Nursing Performance in a University Hospital
    Image Image
    Figure 1 Functional method of nursing care delivery system in study hospital.
    Figure 2 Modified team nursing method of nursing care delivery system in study hospital.
    Effects of a New Nursing Delivery System on Nurses' Satisfaction, Self-efficacy, Job Stress, and Nursing Performance in a University Hospital

    General Characteristics of Study Participants (N=72)

    Differences in Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy, Job Stress and Nursing Performance according to Time (N=72)

    Pre=Functional method; Post 1M=Modified team nursing method 1 month later; Post 3M=Modified team nursing method 3 months later.

    Differences in Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy, Job Stress, and Nursing Performance according to Time Series (N=72)

    Pre=functional method; Post 1M=modified team nursing method 1 month later; Post 3M=modified team nursing method 3 months later; a, b>c; a<c.

    Table 1 General Characteristics of Study Participants (N=72)

    Table 2 Differences in Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy, Job Stress and Nursing Performance according to Time (N=72)

    Pre=Functional method; Post 1M=Modified team nursing method 1 month later; Post 3M=Modified team nursing method 3 months later.

    Table 3 Differences in Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy, Job Stress, and Nursing Performance according to Time Series (N=72)

    Pre=functional method; Post 1M=modified team nursing method 1 month later; Post 3M=modified team nursing method 3 months later; a, b>c; a<c.

    TOP