• KANAD
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Development of a Performance Appraisal Tool for Postoperative Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2016;22(3):270-278.
Published online: June 30, 2016

Department of Nursing, Sunchon National University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Lee, Yoon Young. Department of Nursing, Sunchon National University, 255 Jungangno, Suncheon 57922, Korea. Tel: +82-61-750-3884, Fax: +82-61-750-3880, yylee@sunchon.ac.kr
• Received: March 5, 2016   • Revised: May 21, 2016   • Accepted: June 8, 2016

Copyright © 2016 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 12 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Crossref
prev next
  • Purpose
    The purpose of this study was to develop a performance appraisal tool (PAT) for postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) nurses.
  • Methods
    This study was a descriptive, non-experimental methodological study. The PAT was developed through a literature review and tests for validity and reliability.
  • Results
    Subsequent to a review of the literature on nursing performance of PACU nurse, a 63 item questionnaire was developed. Through factor analysis, 61 items in 3 domains with 8 factors were derived. Cronbach's α coefficient of the final instrument was .99.
  • Conclusion
    This tool is an efficient PAT for PACU providing meaningful feedback for professional growth in PACU nurses.
  • 1. Huber D. Leadership and nursing care management. 4th ed. Maryland Heights, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2010.
  • 2. Marriner-Tomey A. Guide to nursing management and leadership. 8th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.
  • 3. Osman IH, Berbary LN, Sidani Y, Al-Ayoubi B, Emrouznejad A. Data envelopment analysis model for the appraisal and relative performance evaluation of nurses at an intensive care unit. J Med Syst. 2011;35(5):1039-1062.
  • 4. Bannigan K. To serve better: addressing poor performance in occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2000;63(11):523-528.
  • 5. Mary T, Pamela A, Carrie B. The performance appraisal as a development tool. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2008;24(3):E12-E18.
  • 6. Porteous J. Performance appraisals in the OR: everyone's business. Can Oper Room Nurs J. 2006;24(3):8-10. 1214-15. 17-18.
  • 7. Hatfield A. The complete recovery room book. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
  • 8. Allen J. American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Perianesthesia nursing standards, practice recommendations, and interpretive statements: 2015-2017. Cherry Hill, NJ: American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses; 2014.
  • 9. Park SA, Park KO, Kim MS, Yoon GS, Lee YY. Development of performance evaluation tool for operating room nurses. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2008;14(1):71-84.
  • 10. Park KO, Lee YY. Developing a performance appraisal tool for neonatal intensive care unit registered nurses. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2011;17(2):267-276.
  • 11. Olmstead J, Falcone D, Lopez J, Sharpe L, Michna J. Perioperative employee annual evaluations: A 30-second process. AORN J. 2012;96(6):627-633.
  • 12. Pritchard V, Eckard JM. Standards of nursing care in the post-anesthesia care unit. J Post Anesth Nurs. 1990;5(3):163-167.
  • 13. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-497.
  • 14. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-467.
  • 15. Lee SM. Basic of factor analysis. Paju: Kyoyookgwahaksa; 2003.
  • 16. Gorsuch RL. Factor analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1983.
  • 17. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
  • 18. Lee YY. Analysis of post-anesthetic core nursing interventions using nursing intervention classification [master's thesis]. Seoul: Chung-Ang University; 2001.
  • 19. Park SA, Park KO, Kim SY, Sung YH. A development of standardized nurse performance appraisal tool. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2007;13(1):197-211.
  • 20. Cowan DT, Jenifer Wilson-Barnett D, Norman IJ, Murrells T. Measuring nursing competence: development of a self-assessment tool for general nurses across Europe. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(6):902-913.
  • 21. Kalb KB, Cherry NM, Kauzloric J, Brender A, Green K, Miyagawa L, et al. A competency-based approach to public health nursing performance appraisal. Public Health Nurs. 2006;23(2):115-138.
Table 1

General Characteristics of the Professional Group (N=20)

jkana-22-270-i001.jpg
Table 2

Validity of the Performance Appraisal Tool for Post Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses (N=20)

jkana-22-270-i002.jpg

I-CVI=item-level Content Validity Index; S-CVI/Ave=scale-level Content Validity Index/average.

Table 3

General Characteristics of Post Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses (N=103)

jkana-22-270-i003.jpg
Table 4

Summary of Factor Analysis for Performance Appraisal Tool for Post Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses

jkana-22-270-i004.jpg

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • The Gathering of Nations: From Copenhagen to Sydney!
      Ellen L. Poole
      Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing.2018; 33(5): 757.     CrossRef
    • Developing of a Tool for Ambulatory Care Nurse Competencies
      Myoungjin Min, Soyoung Yu
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2017; 23(1): 90.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Development of a Performance Appraisal Tool for Postoperative Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses
    J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2016;22(3):270-278.   Published online June 30, 2016
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Development of a Performance Appraisal Tool for Postoperative Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses
    J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2016;22(3):270-278.   Published online June 30, 2016
    Close
    Development of a Performance Appraisal Tool for Postoperative Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses
    Development of a Performance Appraisal Tool for Postoperative Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses

    General Characteristics of the Professional Group (N=20)

    Validity of the Performance Appraisal Tool for Post Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses (N=20)

    I-CVI=item-level Content Validity Index; S-CVI/Ave=scale-level Content Validity Index/average.

    General Characteristics of Post Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses (N=103)

    Summary of Factor Analysis for Performance Appraisal Tool for Post Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses

    Table 1 General Characteristics of the Professional Group (N=20)

    Table 2 Validity of the Performance Appraisal Tool for Post Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses (N=20)

    I-CVI=item-level Content Validity Index; S-CVI/Ave=scale-level Content Validity Index/average.

    Table 3 General Characteristics of Post Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses (N=103)

    Table 4 Summary of Factor Analysis for Performance Appraisal Tool for Post Anesthesia Care Unit Nurses

    TOP