• KANAD
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

An Evaluation of Effects on Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Management of a Community-Based Nursing Care Center Using Cost-Benefit Analysis

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2010;16(3):295-305.
Published online: September 30, 2010

1Professor, Department of Nursing, Inha University, Korea.

2Director, Gwangju City Health Center, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.

3Lecturer, College of Nursing, Korea University, Korea.

4Market Access Director, Pfizer Korea, Korea.

Correspondence: Lim, Ji Young. Department of Nursing, Inha University, #253, Younghyun-Dong, Nam-Gu, Incheon, Korea. Tel: 82-32-860-8210, Fax: 82-32-874-5880, lim20712@inha.ac.kr
• Received: July 15, 2010   • Revised: August 25, 2010   • Accepted: September 15, 2010

Copyright © 2010 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

  • 22 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Crossref
prev next
  • Purpose
    This study was conducted to evaluate the economic efficiency of a community-based nursing care center to help policy makers determine whether or not to invest in similar facilities.
  • Methods
    The subjects were 101 elderly people over 65 years who participated in a health management program from February 1 to July 31, 2007. Direct cost was estimated with center operations cost, medical cost for out-patients and pharmacy cost. Indirect cost was measured by transportation cost. Direct benefit was calculated by saved medical cost for out-patients, saved pharmacy cost, saved transportation cost, and reducing hospital charges. Indirect benefit was estimated with prevention of severe complications. Economic efficiency was evaluated by cost-benefit ratio and net benefit.
  • Results
    Operating a community-based nursing care center was found to be cost-effective. Specifically, the cost of operating the center evaluated here was estimated at 135 million won while the benefit was estimated at 187 million won. Benefit-cost ratio was 1.38.
  • Conclusion
    The Community-based nursing care center that was described here could be a useful health care delivery system for reducing medical expenditures.
  • 1. Allred CA, Arford PH, Mauldin PD, Goodwin LK. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the nursing literature, 1992-1996. Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(3):235-242.
  • 2. Drummond MF, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 1997;2ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • 3. Kim CI, Lee HS, Jang YO, Lee YN, Lee HJ. Korea national health and nutrition examination survey. 2005;Seoul, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affaires.
  • 4. Kim DK. Cost-benefit analysis. 1997;Seoul, Parkyoungsa.
  • 5. Kim HJ, Hue JH, Lee MH, Kang HY, Jee SH, Nam JM, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of national prevention programs for cardiovascular diseases. 2007;Seoul, Management Center for Health Promotion.
  • 6. Lee DB. The epidemiologic study of chronic complications in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. 1998;Gwangju, Chonnam National University. Unpublished master's thesis.
  • 7. Lee KS, Kam S, Park KS, Jung BK, Kim SK. Community-based hypertension and diabetes management model development for improving adherence and compliance. 2007;Seoul, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • 8. Lee TW, Ko IS. Cost-benefit analysis on community health practitioner. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2002;32(4):435-446.
  • 9. Li C, Engstrom G, Hedblad B, Berglund G, Janzon L. Blood pressure control and risk of stroke: A population-based prospective cohort study. Stroke. 2005;36(4):725-730.
  • 10. Lim JY. A cost-utility analysis of home care services by using the QALY. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004;34(3):449-457.
  • 11. Min SH, Ko S, Lim JY. Economic evaluation of Gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy for non small-cell lung cancer patient in an outpatient setting. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2008;38(3):363-371.
  • 12. Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs. The guideline of long term care insurance. 2008a;04;Seoul, Author.
  • 13. Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs. The manual of customized visiting health care program. 2008b;12;Seoul.
  • 14. Park CG. Risk profiles for stroke and treatment modality in hypertensive patients. J Korean Soc Hypertens. 2006;12(2):16-24.
  • 15. Rice D. Estimating the cost of illness. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1967;57(3):424-440.
  • 16. Son HY, Kim CY, Back SH, Kim JY. Diabetes in Korea 2007. 2007;Seoul, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service.
  • 17. Song MS. Report on management and operations of intensive nursing care center for elderly at home in Gwang-Ju. 2006;Gwang-Ju, Community Health Center.
  • 18. Stone PW. Methods for conducting and reporting cost-effectiveness analysis in nursing. Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(3):229-234.
  • 19. Yang BM. Health care economics. 1999;Seoul, Nanamsinseo.
  • 20. Yim ES. Cost-benefit analysis of the case management for the elderly patients with hypertension. 2008;Seoul, Yonsei University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  • 21. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ôunpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al. Effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infartion in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937-952.
Table 1
Characteristics of subjects* (N=101)
jkana-16-295-i001.jpg

*Missing value excluded; Multiple choice; DM= Diabetes mellitus; §CVA=Cerebro vascular accident

SBP=Systolic blood pressure; DBP=Diastolic blood pressure

Table 2
Cost analysis of community based intensive nursing care center for elderly
jkana-16-295-i002.jpg

*OPC=Out patient clinic;

Patient number of OPC visit per month × Average cost of OPC per visit × Average number of OPC visit per month;

Patient number of pharmacy visit per month × Average pharmacy cost of pharmacy per visit × Average number of pharmacy visit per month;

§Public transportation cost per one time

Table 3
Benefit analysis of community based intensive nursing care center for elderly
jkana-16-295-i003.jpg

*Number of reduced OPC visit per month; Number of reduced pharmacy visit per month;

Number of managed hypertension patient per month × Hospital admission rate of hypertension × Average hospital charges of hypertension patient per year;

§ Number of managed DM patient per month × Hospital admission rate of DM × Average hospital charges of DM patient per year;

Number of managed hypertension patient per month × Severe complications rate of hypertension × Average hospital charges of severe hypertension complications per year;

Number of managed DM patient per month × Severe complications rate of DM × Average hospital charges of severe DM complications per year;

Table 4
Summary of cost-benefit analysis and sensitivity analysis
jkana-16-295-i004.jpg

*PAR=Population attributable risk

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Cost-Benefit Analysis of Occupational Therapy in Center for Dementia Based on Public Data
      Seung-Hyun Cho, Kyung-Yoon Kam, Sung-Yoon Bae, Nam-Hoon Cho, Hye-Won Oh, Young-Ae Yang
      Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy.2018; 26(2): 99.     CrossRef
    • Comparison of Benefit Estimation Models in Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Case of Chronic Hypertension Management Programs
      Ji Young Lim, Mi Ja Kim, Chang Gi Park, Jung Yun Kim
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2011; 41(6): 750.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    An Evaluation of Effects on Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Management of a Community-Based Nursing Care Center Using Cost-Benefit Analysis
    J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2010;16(3):295-305.   Published online September 30, 2010
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    An Evaluation of Effects on Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Management of a Community-Based Nursing Care Center Using Cost-Benefit Analysis
    J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2010;16(3):295-305.   Published online September 30, 2010
    Close
    An Evaluation of Effects on Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Management of a Community-Based Nursing Care Center Using Cost-Benefit Analysis
    An Evaluation of Effects on Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Management of a Community-Based Nursing Care Center Using Cost-Benefit Analysis

    Characteristics of subjects* (N=101)

    *Missing value excluded; Multiple choice; DM= Diabetes mellitus; §CVA=Cerebro vascular accident

    SBP=Systolic blood pressure; DBP=Diastolic blood pressure

    Cost analysis of community based intensive nursing care center for elderly

    *OPC=Out patient clinic;

    Patient number of OPC visit per month × Average cost of OPC per visit × Average number of OPC visit per month;

    Patient number of pharmacy visit per month × Average pharmacy cost of pharmacy per visit × Average number of pharmacy visit per month;

    §Public transportation cost per one time

    Benefit analysis of community based intensive nursing care center for elderly

    *Number of reduced OPC visit per month; Number of reduced pharmacy visit per month;

    Number of managed hypertension patient per month × Hospital admission rate of hypertension × Average hospital charges of hypertension patient per year;

    § Number of managed DM patient per month × Hospital admission rate of DM × Average hospital charges of DM patient per year;

    Number of managed hypertension patient per month × Severe complications rate of hypertension × Average hospital charges of severe hypertension complications per year;

    Number of managed DM patient per month × Severe complications rate of DM × Average hospital charges of severe DM complications per year;

    Summary of cost-benefit analysis and sensitivity analysis

    *PAR=Population attributable risk

    Table 1 Characteristics of subjects* (N=101)

    *Missing value excluded; Multiple choice; DM= Diabetes mellitus; §CVA=Cerebro vascular accident

    SBP=Systolic blood pressure; DBP=Diastolic blood pressure

    Table 2 Cost analysis of community based intensive nursing care center for elderly

    *OPC=Out patient clinic;

    Patient number of OPC visit per month × Average cost of OPC per visit × Average number of OPC visit per month;

    Patient number of pharmacy visit per month × Average pharmacy cost of pharmacy per visit × Average number of pharmacy visit per month;

    §Public transportation cost per one time

    Table 3 Benefit analysis of community based intensive nursing care center for elderly

    *Number of reduced OPC visit per month; Number of reduced pharmacy visit per month;

    Number of managed hypertension patient per month × Hospital admission rate of hypertension × Average hospital charges of hypertension patient per year;

    § Number of managed DM patient per month × Hospital admission rate of DM × Average hospital charges of DM patient per year;

    Number of managed hypertension patient per month × Severe complications rate of hypertension × Average hospital charges of severe hypertension complications per year;

    Number of managed DM patient per month × Severe complications rate of DM × Average hospital charges of severe DM complications per year;

    Table 4 Summary of cost-benefit analysis and sensitivity analysis

    *PAR=Population attributable risk

    TOP