• KANAD
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2013;19(1):146-154.
Published online: January 31, 2013

1Department of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Korea.

Correspondence: Song, Kijun. Department of Biostatistics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134, Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2228-2497, Fax: 82-2-364-8037, biostat@yuhs.ac
• Received: December 17, 2012   • Revised: January 5, 2013   • Accepted: January 9, 2013

Copyright © 2013 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

  • 16 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 3 Crossref
prev next
  • Purpose
    To do nursing research effectively requires an understanding of fundamental principles of statistical methods. In this article, some key statistical methods which are commonly used in nursing research are identified and summarized.
  • Methods
    Ninety-two original articles from the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration were reviewed. Statistical methods were classified and summarized for usage in research and occurrence of common errors.
  • Results
    Among the original articles reviewed, 58 statistical usages contained errors. Most errors were found in linear regression analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and chi-square test. From the detection of statistical errors in usage, suggestions for appropriate statistical methods were made.
  • Conclusion
    In order to improve validity of original articles in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, clearly stated statistical usage and close editorial attention to statistical methods are needed. Understanding statistical methods is part of the process that researchers must use to determine both quality and usefulness of the research. Research findings will be used to guide nursing practice and reduce uncertainty in decision making. However, to understand how to interpret research results, it is important to be able to understand basic statistical concepts. Researchers should also choose statistical methods that match their purposes.
  • 1. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 2002;2nd ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  • 2. Altman DG. Statistical reviewing for medical journals. Stat Med. 1998;17:2661-2674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981215)17:23<2661::AID-SIM33>3.0.CO;2-B
  • 3. Altman DG. Statistics in medical journals: Some recent trends. Stat Med. 2000;19:3275-3289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3275::AID-SIM626>3.0.CO;2-M
  • 4. Altman DG, Goodman SN, Schroter S. How statistical expertise is used in medical research. JAMA. 2002;287:2817-2820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2817
  • 5. Altman DG. The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ. 1994;308:283-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283
  • 6. Altman DG. Poor-quality medical research: What can journals do? JAMA. 2002;287:2765-2767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2765
  • 7. Armitage P, Colton T. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. 1998;New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  • 8. Bailar JC 3rd, Mosteller F. Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals: Amplifications and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:266-273.
  • 9. Dillon WR, Goldsrein M. Multivariate analysis. 1984;New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  • 10. Emerson JD, Colditz GA. Use of statistical analysis in the New England Journal of Medicine. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:709-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198309223091206
  • 11. Fisher VB, Lumley H. Biostatistics: A methodology for the health sciences. 2004;2nd ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  • 12. Forthofer RN, Lee ES, Hernandez M. Biostatistics: A guide to design, analysis, and discovery. 2007;New York, ELSEVIER.
  • 13. Hair JF, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 1995;4th ed. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
  • 14. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applies logistic regression. 2000;2nd ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  • 15. Lachin JM. Biostatistical methods: The assessment of relative risks. 2000;New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  • 16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
  • 17. MacArthur RD, Jackson GG. An evaluation of the use of statistical methodology in the Journal of Infectious Disease. J Infect Dis. 1984;149:349-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/149.3.349
  • 18. Redmond CK, Colton T. Biostatistics in clinical research. 2001;New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  • 19. Rennie D. Freedom and responsibility in medical publication: Setting the balancing right. JAMA. 1998;280:300-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.300
  • 20. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 2011;7th ed. Pacific Grove, Duxbury.
  • 21. Shoukri MM, Pause MM. Statistical methods for health sciences. 1998;2nd. ed. New York, CRC Press.
  • 22. Sterne JA, Davey SG. Sifting the evidence: What's wrong with significance tests? BMJ. 2001;322:226-231.
Table 1
Common Statistical Methods Used in Nursing Research
jkana-19-146-i001.jpg
Table 2
Uses and Errors of Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
jkana-19-146-i002.jpg
Table 3
Type of Errors for Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
jkana-19-146-i003.jpg

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Future Outlook of Nursing Management Research: Analysis of Articles Published in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration from 2012-2021
      Eungyung Kim, Sung-Hyun Cho, Jihyun Kim, Jong Kyung Kim, Eunhee Lee
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2023; 29(5): 553.     CrossRef
    • Analysis of Manuscripts Rejected by the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration [2012~2015 Jun]
      Seok Hee Jeong, Taewha Lee, Soyoung Yu, Myoung Hee Seo
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2015; 21(5): 561.     CrossRef
    • Type of Statistical Methods and Errors in the Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing
      Eunhee Choi
      Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2015; 22(4): 452.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
    J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2013;19(1):146-154.   Published online January 31, 2013
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
    J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2013;19(1):146-154.   Published online January 31, 2013
    Close
    Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
    Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

    Common Statistical Methods Used in Nursing Research

    Uses and Errors of Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

    Type of Errors for Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

    Table 1 Common Statistical Methods Used in Nursing Research

    Table 2 Uses and Errors of Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

    Table 3 Type of Errors for Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

    TOP