• KANAD
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Influence of Nurses' Sense of Coherence on Their Stress and Quality of Life

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2011;17(4):493-507.
Published online: December 31, 2011

1Part Manager, Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Korea.

2Professor, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Korea.

Correspondence: Choi, Smi. College of Nursing, Seoul National University, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, 28 Yeongeon-Dong Jongro-Gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea. Tel: 82-2-740-8830, Fax: 82-2-765-4103, smi@snu.ac.kr
• Received: September 11, 2011   • Revised: October 24, 2011   • Accepted: November 18, 2011

Copyright © 2011 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

  • 21 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 6 Crossref
prev next
  • Purpose
    The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sense of coherence (SOC) on occupational stress, psychosocial stress and quality of life (QOL) of nurses working in a hospital.
  • Methods
    The participants were 401 nurses working in S hospital in Seoul. A stratified random sampling was performed for the all nurses in S hospital which were grouped by age and work unit. Data were collected by a self-report survey. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson correlations, multiple linear regressions, and ANOVA.
  • Results
    This study showed nurses' occupational stress was at high risk and their psychosocial stress, at low risk. It also showed that those two types of stress are mutual predictors for each other and that SOC was a predictor for both types of stress. For QOL, SOC was also a predictor in SF-36 and MCS (Mental Component Summary). Therefore, SOC may be considered as a major controlling factor for stress and QOL.
  • Conclusion
    The results indicate the need to develop programs that enhances nurses' SOC, programs that could be utilized as an intervention to reduce nurses' stress and to promote nurses' QOL.
  • 1. Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. 1987;San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • 2. Basińska MA, Andruszkiewicz A, Grabowska M. Nurses' sense of coherence and their work related patterns of behaviour. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2011;24(3):256-266.
  • 3. Bengtsson-Tops A, Hansson L. The validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence measure in a sample of schizophrenic patients living in the community. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33(4):432-438.
  • 4. Binkowska-Bury M, Januszewicz P. Sense of coherence and health-related behaviour among university students-a questionnaire survey. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2010;18(3):145-150.
  • 5. Chang EM, Bidewell JW, Huntington AD, Daly J, Johnson A, Wilson H, et al. A survey of role stress, coping and health in Australian and New Zealand hospital nurses. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(8):1354-1362.
  • 6. Chang SJ. Standardization of collection and measurement of health statistics data. 2000;Seoul, Korea, The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine. 92-143.
  • 7. Chang SJ, Koh SB, Kang DM, Kim SA, Kang MG, Lee CG, et al. Developing an occupational stress scale for Korean employees. Korean J Occup Environ Med. 2005;17(4):297-317.
  • 8. Delgado C. Sense of coherence, spirituality, stress and quality of life in chronic illness. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(3):229-234.
  • 9. Eriksson M, Lindström B. Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(6):460-466.
  • 10. Eriksson M, Lindström B. A salutogenic interpretation of the Ottawa charter. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(2):190-199.
  • 11. Erim Y, Beckmann M, Kroencke S, Schulz KH, Tagay S, Valentin-Gamazo C, et al. Sense of coherence and social support predict living liver donors' emotional stress prior to living-donor liver transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2008;22(3):273-280.
  • 12. Flensborg-Madsen T, Ventegodt S, Merrick J. Why is Antonovsky's sense of coherence not correlated to physical health? analysing Antonovsky's 29-item sense of coherence scale(SOC-29). ScientificWorldJournal. 2005;14(5):767-776.
  • 13. Fok SK, Chair SY, Lopez V. Sense of coherence, coping and quality of life following a critical illness. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49(2):173-181.
  • 14. Haas BK. A multidisciplinary concept analysis of quality of life. West J Nurs Res. 1999;21(6):728-742.
  • 15. Haoka T, Sasahara S, Tomotsune Y, Yoshino S, Maeno T, Matsuzaki I. The effect of stress-related factors on mental health status among resident doctors in Japan. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):826-834.
  • 16. Kim HC, Kwon KS, Koh DH, Leem JH, Park SG, Shin JY, et al. The relationship between job stress and psychosocial stress among nurses at a university hospital. Korean J Occup Environ Med. 2005;18(1):25-34.
  • 17. Kim SS, Park JS, Roh YS. The relationship of individual characteristics, perceived health status, body image, and health promoting behavior in hospital nurses. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2005;17(1):88-99.
  • 18. Koh SB, Son MA, Kong JO, Lee CG, Chang SJ, Cha BS. Job characteristics and psychosocial distress of atypical workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med. 2004;16(1):103-113.
  • 19. Lerdal A, Andenæs R, Bjørnsborg E, Bonsaksen T, Borge L, Christiansen B, et al. Personal factors associated with health-related quality of life in persons with morbid obesity on treatment waiting lists in Norway. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(8):1187-1196.
  • 20. Lee EH, Chang SJ, Kim HO, Roh JH, Park EJ, Won JU. Relationship between job stress and turnover of registered nurses in a university hospital. Korean J Occup Environ Med. 2007;19(2):93-103.
  • 21. NIOSH. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 99-101. Stress at work. 1999;America.
  • 22. Norekvål TM, Fridlund B, Moons P, Nordrehaug JE, Saevareid HI, Wentzel-Larsen T, et al. Sense of coherence-a determinant of quality of life over time in older female acute myocardial infarction survivors. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(5-6):820-831.
  • 23. Park JS. Factors influencing on burnout experience in working nurses at hospital. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2002;8(4):550-558.
  • 24. Park JS, Seo IS, Oh JA, Choi ES. Sense of coherence and coping resources of working Nurses at hospital. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2001;7(3):348-358.
  • 25. Seo IS. A study on the sense of coherence and compliance in patients with diabetes mellitus. 2002;Seoul, Catholic University. Unpublished master's thesis.
  • 26. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to score version 2 of the SF-36 health survey(Standard & Acute forms). 2000;Lincoln, RI, QualityMetric Incorporated.
  • 27. Yoon CK, Lee HN. A study on the job stress of nurses in hospital. J Korean Soc Health Stat. 2003;28(2):95-109.
  • 28. Yoon GS, Kim SY. Influence of job stress and burnout on turnover intention of nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2010;16(4):507-516.
  • 29. Yoon HS, Cho YC. Relationship between job stress contents, psychosocial factors and mental health status among university hospital nurses in Korea. J Prev Med Public Health. 2007;40(5):351-362.
  • 30. Yoon SH. Occupational stress and depression in clinical uurses-using Korean occupational stress scales-. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2009;15(3):463-470.
Fig 1
Conceptual model for this study
jkana-17-493-g001.jpg
Table 1
General Characteristics of Participants (n=401)
jkana-17-493-i001.jpg

(1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit, (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit

(3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care

(5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

Table 2
Occupational Stress According to General Characteristics, SOC and Psychosocial Stress (continued) (n=401)
jkana-17-493-i002.jpg

(1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

*Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): Age; 20-29 vs 30-39, 20-29 vs 40-49, 30-39 vs 40-49, Education; College vs Graduate school, University vs Graduate school, Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 2, 0 vs Above 3

number(%)

Table 3
Psychosocial Stress According to General Characteristics, SOC and Occupational Stress (n=401)
jkana-17-493-i003.jpg

(1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

*Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): Age; 20-29 vs 40-49, 30-39 vs 40-49, Education; Junior College vs Graduate school, Current Work Experience; <1 vs ≥3, Working Unit; ICU vs OPD & Others, Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 2

number(%)

Table 4
SOC According to General Characteristics and Stress (n=401)
jkana-17-493-i004.jpg

(1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

*Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 2

number(%)

Table 5
SF-36 Total Score, PCS Score and MCS Score According to General Characteristics, SOC and Stress (n=401)
jkana-17-493-i005.jpg

(1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PAR; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

*Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): SF-36 Total score-Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 1, 0 vs 2, 0 vs Above 3, 1 vs Above 3, PCS-Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 1, 0 vs 2, 0 vs Above 3, 1 vs Above 3, MCS-Current Work Experience; <1 vs ≥3

Table 6
Correlation Analysis of SOC, SF-36 Total Score, PCS Score, MCS Score and Stress
jkana-17-493-i006.jpg

*P< .05 **P<.01

(1) SOC; Sense of Coherence

(2) PCS; Physical Component Summary

(3) MCS; Mental Component Summary

Table 7-1
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis for SOC and sSress
jkana-17-493-i007.jpg

(1) SOC; Sense of Coherence

Table 7-2
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis for SF-36 Total Score, PCS Score and MCS Score
jkana-17-493-i008.jpg

(1) SOC; Sense of Coherence

(2) PCS; Physical Component Summary

(3) MCS; Mental Component Summary

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Study of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Pain and Health-related Quality of Life among Hospital Workers
      Giwon Kim, Chun Sun Lee, Kyunghee Lee
      The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy.2019; 31(5): 304.     CrossRef
    • The Relationship among Anger-in, Forgiveness, and Quality of Life in Clinical Nurses
      Jeong Hwa Choi, Young Sook Tae, Je Eun Heo, Young Suk Kim
      Journal of East-West Nursing Research.2016; 22(1): 78.     CrossRef
    • Structural Equation Modeling on Health Status in Hospital Nurses: Based on the Theory of Salutogenesis With Bio Behavioral Approach
      Kyeong Sug Kim, Smi Choi-Kwon, Kihye Han
      Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science.2015; 17(1): 50.     CrossRef
    • Relationship between Job Stress and Health Status(SF-36) Among General Hospital Nurses
      Yeon-Hee Lim, Young-Chae Cho
      Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society.2015; 16(7): 4745.     CrossRef
    • Sense of Coherence and Academic Stress in Nursing Students
      Mihyon Lee, Misook Park
      The Journal of the Korea Contents Association.2014; 14(12): 863.     CrossRef
    • Sense of Coherence and Stress of Clinical Practice in Nursing Students
      Eun-Ju Lee, Won-Hee Jun
      The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education.2013; 19(2): 163.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Influence of Nurses' Sense of Coherence on Their Stress and Quality of Life
    J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2011;17(4):493-507.   Published online December 31, 2011
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Influence of Nurses' Sense of Coherence on Their Stress and Quality of Life
    J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2011;17(4):493-507.   Published online December 31, 2011
    Close

    Figure

    • 0
    Influence of Nurses' Sense of Coherence on Their Stress and Quality of Life
    Image
    Fig 1 Conceptual model for this study
    Influence of Nurses' Sense of Coherence on Their Stress and Quality of Life

    General Characteristics of Participants (n=401)

    (1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit, (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit

    (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care

    (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    Occupational Stress According to General Characteristics, SOC and Psychosocial Stress (continued) (n=401)

    (1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    *Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): Age; 20-29 vs 30-39, 20-29 vs 40-49, 30-39 vs 40-49, Education; College vs Graduate school, University vs Graduate school, Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 2, 0 vs Above 3

    number(%)

    Psychosocial Stress According to General Characteristics, SOC and Occupational Stress (n=401)

    (1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    *Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): Age; 20-29 vs 40-49, 30-39 vs 40-49, Education; Junior College vs Graduate school, Current Work Experience; <1 vs ≥3, Working Unit; ICU vs OPD & Others, Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 2

    number(%)

    SOC According to General Characteristics and Stress (n=401)

    (1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    *Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 2

    number(%)

    SF-36 Total Score, PCS Score and MCS Score According to General Characteristics, SOC and Stress (n=401)

    (1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PAR; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    *Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): SF-36 Total score-Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 1, 0 vs 2, 0 vs Above 3, 1 vs Above 3, PCS-Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 1, 0 vs 2, 0 vs Above 3, 1 vs Above 3, MCS-Current Work Experience; <1 vs ≥3

    Correlation Analysis of SOC, SF-36 Total Score, PCS Score, MCS Score and Stress

    *P< .05 **P<.01

    (1) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    (2) PCS; Physical Component Summary

    (3) MCS; Mental Component Summary

    Multiple Linear Regression Analysis for SOC and sSress

    (1) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    Multiple Linear Regression Analysis for SF-36 Total Score, PCS Score and MCS Score

    (1) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    (2) PCS; Physical Component Summary

    (3) MCS; Mental Component Summary

    Table 1 General Characteristics of Participants (n=401)

    (1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit, (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit

    (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care

    (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    Table 2 Occupational Stress According to General Characteristics, SOC and Psychosocial Stress (continued) (n=401)

    (1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    *Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): Age; 20-29 vs 30-39, 20-29 vs 40-49, 30-39 vs 40-49, Education; College vs Graduate school, University vs Graduate school, Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 2, 0 vs Above 3

    number(%)

    Table 3 Psychosocial Stress According to General Characteristics, SOC and Occupational Stress (n=401)

    (1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    *Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): Age; 20-29 vs 40-49, 30-39 vs 40-49, Education; Junior College vs Graduate school, Current Work Experience; <1 vs ≥3, Working Unit; ICU vs OPD & Others, Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 2

    number(%)

    Table 4 SOC According to General Characteristics and Stress (n=401)

    (1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PARU; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    *Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 2

    number(%)

    Table 5 SF-36 Total Score, PCS Score and MCS Score According to General Characteristics, SOC and Stress (n=401)

    (1) ICU; Intensive Care Unit (2) OR & PAR; Operating Room & Postanesthetic Recovery Unit (3) OPD; Outpatient Department (4) Others; Dialysis room, Intravenous injection team & Home care (5) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    *Bonferroni multiple comparisons test for Continuous variables(p-value<.05): SF-36 Total score-Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 1, 0 vs 2, 0 vs Above 3, 1 vs Above 3, PCS-Number of visits to Medical Center; 0 vs 1, 0 vs 2, 0 vs Above 3, 1 vs Above 3, MCS-Current Work Experience; <1 vs ≥3

    Table 6 Correlation Analysis of SOC, SF-36 Total Score, PCS Score, MCS Score and Stress

    *P< .05 **P<.01

    (1) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    (2) PCS; Physical Component Summary

    (3) MCS; Mental Component Summary

    Table 7-1 Multiple Linear Regression Analysis for SOC and sSress

    (1) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    Table 7-2 Multiple Linear Regression Analysis for SF-36 Total Score, PCS Score and MCS Score

    (1) SOC; Sense of Coherence

    (2) PCS; Physical Component Summary

    (3) MCS; Mental Component Summary

    TOP